Navigating the Challenges Impacting Whistleblowing Programs – Part 2

A strong whistleblowing policy demonstrates to your workforce that misconduct, malpractice or illegal activity will not be tolerated and that any individuals who reports wrongdoing will be listened to and supported, with appropriate action taken in accordance with legal frameworks. However, there are many obstacles at play that can undermine the effectiveness of your organisation’s whistleblowing program.

‍

An effective and user-friendly reporting system, such as a reliable hotline, means your employees can easily access the key tools and processes to enable them to speak out, should the situation arise.

‍

In this follow-up to our [previous blog], we will some address further challenges that your organisation must consider when designing and implementing a whistleblowing framework.

Complex Reporting Mechanisms

Effective whistleblowing requires clear and accessible reporting mechanisms. Many organisations, however, have reporting processes that are convoluted and opaque. This complexity can deter individuals from coming forward, as they may feel uncertain about how to report misconduct or be afraid that their disclosures will not be adequately addressed.

As well as simplifying and streamlining reporting channels to encourage more employees to report unethical behaviour, you should actively communicate the mechanisms of the reporting process to all employees. This can be achieved through visually clear, step-by-step guides that outline how to report misconduct.

Personal and Professional Risks

Speaking out and exposing misconduct or unlawful practices within an organisation takes courage and yet, in doing so, whistleblowers can face significant personal and professional risks. Beyond the immediate threat of retaliation, individuals may experience long-term ‘punishing’ consequences to their mental (and even physical) health, caused by harassment from colleagues and senior leaders.

Other serious risks include damage to career prospects, demotion or reduction in pay - even job termination. The decision to blow the whistle often means weighing these threats against the potential benefits, and the fear of a negative outcome can feel so overwhelming as to discourage individuals from taking action. 

Public Perception and Media Scrutiny

The role of the media in whistleblowing can be a double-edged sword; by taking their concerns externally – whether to a lawyer, a public forum – or the media itself, whistleblowers can expose organisational malpractice ‘for the greater good of society’. However, if the business in question has engaged in unlawful conduct, it may not hesitate to discredit whistleblowers publicly, to protect its reputation.

While media coverage can amplify the impact of whistleblowing by drawing attention to the issue, it risks subjecting whistleblowers to intense scrutiny and public judgment. To avoid the risks of reputational damage and personal distress caused by this level of visibility, whistleblowers must be prepared to navigate the challenges of media engagement carefully. 

Limited Impact and Change

By exposing wrongdoing, whistleblowers often act with the hope of driving fundamental change. Ensuring that reports of whistleblowing lead to actionable outcomes is essential for maintaining the integrity of the process, requiring buy-in and commitment from everyone in your organisation.

In some cases, businesses may ignore, dismiss or downplay reports of wrongdoing, resulting in the whistleblower feeling disillusioned and frustrated, thus reinforcing a culture of silence where unethical practices remain unchecked. This lack of impact or change may discourage future whistleblowers and risk future incidents of malpractice within the business. 

Case study - The prosecution of Richard Boyle: a whistleblower case highlighting gaps in legal protections

BOYLE v COMMONWEALTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS [2023] SADC 27 (27 March 2023)

Richard Boyle, a former official at the Australian Taxation Office (ATO), became a whistleblower in 2017 after raising concerns about the ATO's aggressive and unethical debt recovery practices. After his internal disclosures were dismissed, he went public, reporting his concerns to an investigative journalist.

Despite Boyle’s whistleblowing leading to several independent inquiries that vindicated allegations of wrongdoing within the tax office’s debt recovery team, he now faces trial on 24 criminal charges as well as potential jail time. These prosecution charges are not for his public whistleblowing, but for his actions in gathering evidence prior to raising his concerns internally, which involved him using his mobile phone to take photographs of sensitive taxpayer information and covertly recording conversations with former colleagues.

In March 2023, the South Australian District Court ruled that Boyle was not immune from prosecution under the Public Interest Disclosure Act, a decision that was widely criticised for failing to protect him. Boyle’s prosecution has highlighted the need for urgent reforms to Australia’s laws, to better protect whistleblowers who often face significant personal and legal risks, even when acting in the public interest.

Building a Workplace Based on Trust and Transparency

Whistleblowing is a vital tool for promoting transparency and accountability within your organisation. To be effective, it needs to be fundamentally embedded within the workplace culture. This requires improved training, support and buy-in from every level, well-communicated reporting and feedback mechanisms and stronger legal protections for whistleblowers.

Veremark Whistleblower Technology Solutions collaborates with both private and public sector organisations to build robust and transparent whistleblowing solutions, designed to promote trust and encourage future disclosures. If you would like to find out how it can support your organisation, get in touch.

‍